Hage,H - Kooij,J
NLD Thematic corr, 2000
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3
Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5 Nxe4 6.Bc4 Be7 7.Nxd4
It leads to a very violent and complicated game that
has been deeply analyzed by theory
9.c3 Nxf2! 10.Qh5 Nxh1 11.cxb4 Nxb4? (11...Re8+! 12.Kf1 Re5 13.Qf3 Qh4 14.Bf4 Re4! 15.Bd3 Ne5 16.Bxe5 Rxe5 17.Nbxc7=
) 12.Bg5 Re8+ 13.Kf1 Re5 14.Re1
1-0 Kenworthy,G-Van der Sterren,P/Ramsgate op 1981]
Nxf2! 10.Qh5! Ne5! 11.b4!?
leads to equality 11...d6!
12.Rxf2 Bg4 13.Qg5 Qxg5 14.Bxg5 Nxc4 15.Nxa8 Rxa8 16.b3 Bxf2+ 17.Kxf2 Ne5 18.Be7! Rc8 19.c4=
This is a mistake. 12.Kh1
Nf2+ 13.Rxf2 Bxf2 14.Bg5 g6 15.Qh6 Ng4 16.Bxd8 Nxh6 17.Bf6 Nf5 18.Nbxc7 Rb8 19.g4
1-0 Kersten - Voetter/Correspondence 1993]
[A lot of ink has been used to analyze the
consequences of 13.Qg5
Nf3+ 14.gxf3 Nh3+ 15.Kh1 Nxg5
with the conclusion that White can achieve a draw at his best.
14.Bxd8 Raxd8 15.cxd6 c6 16.Bb3 Nfg4
17.Rxf2 f6 18.Bxd5+ Bf7
Kh8 18.Nxa7 Rxd6 19.Rae1 Nd7 20.h3 Ngf6 21.g4 Bg6 22.g5 Ng8 23.Nac8 Rd4 24.Nxg6+ hxg6 25.Ne7 Nxe7 26.Rxe7 f6 27.c3 Rd3 28.Rf4 fxg5 29.Rxf8+ Nxf8 30.Kf2 Rd8 31.Rxb7 Rd2+ 32.Ke3 Rd6 33.Rb8 Rf6 34.a4 Kh7 35.a5 1-0